Righteous indignation is defined as strong anger or outrage felt in response to perceived injustice, evil, or unfairness, stemming from a sense of moral rightness rather than personal offence. It's a justified moral reaction that compels one to confront wrongdoing.
Righteous indignation has been a recurring theme in recent weeks as two incidents shook the public consciousness. One was a widespread plight involving Indigo airlines, and the other, a tragic event at a nightclub in Goa leaving 25 people affected. In the aftermath, a cascade of articles flooded the media landscape, critiquing the system's inefficiencies and failings.
Yet, it's worth pondering: isn't everyone a part of this system? We, the very people who bemoan the state of affairs, are the ones casting votes, choosing our leaders, and deciding which services to patronize. These decisions are made because these service providers offer something for which we are willing to part with our money.
However, how often do we consider whether these services are administered by the right kind of people? Rarely do we delve into the corporate backrooms or restaurant kitchens to uncover the truth. It is during unfortunate events like these that deep-seated issues such as governance mishaps or non-compliance with regulations come to light.
The unsettling reality is that we are often complicit, indulging in the urge to shortcut processes. Whether it's bypassing lines at immigration or fast-tracking paperwork, our actions reflect a broader culture of expedience over integrity.
Even at higher pegs of the spectrum, where protecting assets comes into play, complicity is widespread. Although there remains a minority that adheres to the rules, their numbers are dwindling. This begs the question: why do these patterns persist?
Part of the answer lies in the expectation of systemic compromise. This expectation perpetuates itself until a significant failure prompts public outcry. Yet, invariably, normalcy returns, and the cycle begins anew.
Administrative processes, whether acquiring a license or establishing a company, are often long-winded and laden with red tape. In hasty moments, shortcuts feel justifiable, but these compromises often leave indelible marks on individuals or companies.
Solutions exist, fostered by individual resolve and systemic reformation. However, fostering change requires patience and a collective dedication to enduring processes. The common disposition toward impatience, evidenced by erratic driving or skipping queues, indicates a need for a deeper, perhaps spiritual, awakening.
Until we, as a society, recognize and embrace the value of patience in enacting change, such issues will persist. In a nation burgeoning both in population and economic wealth, patience remains sparse, leading to a proliferation of compromises.
Share this post